Spray Applied Polymer Surface Seals

Lessons Learned Workbook

 

 

 Project Library

downloadable & printable Documents (Click to open)

Reports

Final Report

Appendix 1 - User Survey

Appendix 2 - Construction Reports

Appendix 3 - Photo Gallery Thumbnails

Appendix 4 - Subcontractor Research Reports  

Rejuvenator Seal Checklist

Sealer & Rejuvenator Overview

Distributor Truck Review

Annotated Bibliography

Data Reports

WRI (Western Research Institute) Chemical Testing and Binder DSR Reports

MTE (Mathy Technology & Engineering Services) DSR Dynamic Creep Testing Reports

UTEP Portable Seismic Pavement Analyzer Report

North Central Superpave Center Friction and Permeability Reports

UMinn Static Bending - Bending Beam Reports

CA Marysville Friction Data

Presentations

Project Overview PowerPoint - ('Save' to download PowerPoint with notes - 13MB)

Slides & Speaker's notes for Project Overview Powerpoint (pdf)

2002 Project Update

National DOT Survey Results

1/2007 Workshop

Project Summary 1/2007

Caltrans Experience

● Research Presentations

● Supplier Presentations

Proposal & Work Plan

Project Proposal

Detailed Task Listing

Work Plan

Construction Reports

AZ US 87 2001

AZ US 87 2006

CA Marysville

CA SR 78 Salton Sea

MI M35 Project

MN SR 251 2002

MN SR 251 2004

MN SR 251 2006

MN Olmstead CR112 2006

General Conclusions

The goal of the study was to determine the effectiveness of spray applied sealers.  The user survey, the collected laboratory and field data, and the field observations all confirmed that a defined application strategy of fog seals is a cost-effective tool for pavement preservation.

The seals appeared to protect the surface by reducing permeability to moisture for several years after application.  Visual comparisons with control sections showed water running off of sealed surfaces instead of penetrating. 

Fog sealing decreased friction, but original skid resistance returned over time.  Sanding after application increased the friction levels significantly.  The portable CTM and DFT devices appear to be a reasonable surrogate for full scale friction testing.  However, the friction results were higher on the Reclamite sections using both portable and full scale testing than might be predicted from a simple spinning tire field test using a rear-wheel drive pick-up truck.

Rheological testing showed the high temperature modulus of binder within 3/8 inch of the surface was reduced by those sealers containing rejuvenator oils, as long as the pavement was permeable enough for the emulsion to penetrate. None of the rheological data showed significant differences in the stiffness of the binder or the corresponding dense-graded mix more than ½-inch deep in the pavement. Of course better penetration can be expected for open-graded HMA or asphalt-rubber mixes. Mixture testing, however, was too variable to draw conclusions for any open mixes.  It appears one of the roles of the spray applied seals is as a sacrificial layer to address surface cracking. 

The sealers were generally inexpensive and yet effective in providing protection to pavements and prolonging service life.  The primary constraint to the use of sealers on dense HMA mixes appears to be a loss in friction following application. Sealers can also prolong the life of seal coats and open-graded mixes, where concerns with friction loss are considerably fewer. Specific conclusions may be found in each of the “Lessons Learned” sections on the pages of this website.

Provide Early and Sustained Pavement Preservation